Without a break fee, costs and confidentiality still need rules.
If each party bears its own costs, the LOI should say so and also cover confidentiality, return of documents and exclusivity.
Break fee in Austrian M&A: expense reimbursement, contractual penalties, reverse break fee, exclusivity and failed deal risk.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Salzburg law firm for corporate, company and transaction law
Every transaction is handled by a coordinated team of lawyers, legal staff and specialists. In company acquisition matters we look at structure, contract, tax and liability together.
Not every acquisition reaches closing. Due diligence, financing, approvals or closing conditions may stop the deal. A break fee allocates certain costs or an agreed payment.
This is not another LOI overview. It focuses on break fee clauses, expense reimbursement, contractual penalties, reverse break fees and their link to exclusivity, termination and failed conditions.
The clause must fit Austrian contract law and should not be copied blindly from international templates. For the pre-contract framework, see LOI, NDA and confidentiality.
Answer two questions on payment obligation and trigger.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Then the clause needs a clear trigger, amount and rationale.
If each party bears its own costs, the LOI should say so and also cover confidentiality, return of documents and exclusivity.
With clear triggers, define due date, evidence, relationship to damages and possible moderation of contractual penalties.
A generic payment for every failed deal can be disproportionate. Define cases such as breach of exclusivity, financing failure or refused approvals.
A break fee addresses effort, opportunity cost or wrongful conduct. It may protect a seller granting exclusivity or a buyer if the seller sells elsewhere.
Legally, it matters whether the clause is expense reimbursement, contractual penalty or risk allocation. The label alone is not decisive.
Typical triggers include breach of exclusivity, failure to cooperate, failure to procure financing despite commitment or termination after final approval.
A negative due diligence finding should not automatically trigger payment. If the data room reveals a serious risk, the buyer must be able to walk away. The link to closing conditions is important.
The amount should reflect expected adviser fees, data room effort, management time and blocked sale opportunity. Fantasy amounts create pressure but are dispute-prone.
If the payment works like a penalty, contractual penalty rules must be considered. MAC and termination clauses should say whether the break fee is additional or exclusive. See our article on the MAC clause.
The table shows common designs and dispute points.
| Element | Purpose | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Expenses Advisers and data room | Actual effort | Evidence problem |
| Break fee Buyer termination | Fixed amount | Disproportion |
| Reverse break fee Seller termination | Buyer protection | Unclear trigger |
| Exclusivity Negotiation lock | No parallel process | Too broad commitment |
| Approvals Boards and authorities | Risk allocation | Unclear responsibility |
A break fee does not replace clear termination rights. It only helps if trigger and amount fit.
Caution: Do not copy break fee templates from other jurisdictions without review. In an Austrian contract it must be clear whether the clause is expenses, penalty or risk allocation.
It is an agreed payment for defined failed-deal scenarios, such as breach of exclusivity or failure to comply with transaction obligations.
It must be proportionate, justified and clearly drafted. Generic penalty payments without a fitting trigger are dispute-prone.
Often in the LOI, process letter or SPA. It must align with exclusivity, termination rights and closing conditions.
When buying a company, structure, review and contract decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000