Deal
Transaction

Distressed M&A in Austria: acquiring a business in crisis and insolvency

Acquiring a company in crisis and insolvency: pre-insolvency phases, acquisitions out of the estate, avoidance and liability risks and valuation in a distressed setting.

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Your law firm

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte

Salzburg law firm for corporate, company and transaction law

Every transaction is handled by a coordinated team of lawyers, legal staff and specialists. In company acquisition matters we look at structure, contract, tax and liability together.

2 July 2026 · Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt

Companies in crisis are often not sold out of going concern operations but under particular time pressure and with elevated legal risks. Distressed M&A describes the acquisition of a company that is economically impaired, before or during an insolvency proceeding. The logic differs in several respects clearly from a classical transaction.

This post explains the particularities of acquiring in the crisis and out of insolvency under Austrian law. The focus is on the typical process forms, the negotiating partners, the valuation in a crisis situation, the risks of later avoidance and the question whether the acquisition takes place out of court or only out of the opened proceeding.

From a lawyer perspective the clean preparation decides on the economic success. Anyone who buys in the crisis without checking the liability consequences risks follow-on liability, a later avoidance claim or the loss of acquired contract relationships.

Classify your starting position

Are you acquiring out of the crisis or out of an opened proceeding?

Answer one or two questions on the state of the target company and on the risk review. You receive an initial classification of the most important steps for a distressed M&A acquisition.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

In which phase is the target company currently?

An out-of-court crisis must be assessed differently from an opened restructuring or bankruptcy proceeding. The negotiating partner, the time pressure and the legal protection of the transaction depend on it.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

Acquiring from the ongoing proceeding follows its own logic.

In bankruptcy and restructuring proceedings lacking debtor-in-possession status, the insolvency administrator represents the estate. Where the debtor remains in possession, powers under section 171 IO are retained by it; however, transactions are concluded by the restructuring administrator under section 117 IO pursuant to section 172 IO. Consent of the debtor is needed by the administrator to realise assets. Before committing to an offer, the type of proceedings, authority to contract and necessary approvals must be clarified. A separate assessment is required by each statutory liability exception; contractual obligations and third-party rights remain separate issues.

An overview of the typical sale processes is provided by our topic page on share deal and asset deal.

02

The preparation is in place; now the clean execution counts.

If avoidance and liability risks are checked, the acquisition is well set up. Pay attention to the clean split of purchase price and transfer conditions, to a clear allocation of known legacy risks and to the moment of transfer. The transition of employees and key contracts should also be expressly governed. An initial assessment of the risks is provided by our M&A transaction risk profile.

A short legal review ensures that the structure does justice to the particularities of the crisis situation.

03

The risk review is incomplete; sharpening it is advisable.

Without checking the avoidance risks and the liability for legacy debts, significant claw-back claims may loom in a later insolvency. Complete the review: current credit standing, threatened illiquidity, critical liabilities and possible avoidance situations should be captured. A deep look at liability questions in the asset deal is provided by the post on asset deal structures.

Have the open points reviewed before signing. A pitfall discovered later may economically devalue the acquisition.

Crisis, insolvency petition and types of proceeding

Distressed M&A covers several stages. At the beginning stands the out-of-court crisis: the company is economically impaired but has not yet filed for insolvency. The sale is conducted by the owner, often with the involvement of the principal bank and critical creditors. Even here every quarter counts because a worsening of the situation narrows the negotiating room.

The statutory procedural framework governs assets belonging to the estate upon the opening of insolvency proceedings. Control of the estate is exercised by the insolvency administrator in bankruptcy and restructuring proceedings lacking debtor-in-possession status. In restructuring proceedings featuring debtor-in-possession status, section 171 IO generally permits the debtor to act itself. Approval by the restructuring administrator is required for acts outside the ordinary course of business, and the administrator may also object to acts within the ordinary course. Certain transactions are reserved to the administrator by section 172 IO. The mere filing of an insolvency petition does not yet produce these effects.

Which type of proceeding is at hand shapes the entire acquisition: who is the negotiating partner, which consents are needed, which deadlines apply and how quickly can the acquisition be completed? A fundamental classification of transaction forms is provided by our topic page on share deal and asset deal.

Avoidance, liability and typical pitfalls

One of the largest risks of a pre-insolvency acquisition lies in a later avoidance. If an insolvency proceeding follows the acquisition within a certain period, legal acts of the debtor can under certain conditions be unwound. The decisive aspects are above all the insolvency avoidance situations, such as creditor disadvantage or the special knowledge of the parties. The precise situations and deadlines must be assessed case by case.

In an out-of-court acquisition before proceedings open, the continuation of an acquired business may be governed by section 38 UGB, and the acquisition of assets or a business by section 1409 ABGB. Subject to its requirements, certain business taxes and tax withholding amounts of the predecessor also fall within the scope of section 14 BAO. A financial crisis alone does not trigger the statutory insolvency exceptions. Consequently, the form of acquisition and the time of transfer require a combined assessment. The concept of acquiring individual assets is explored in the glossary entry on asset deal.

A pitfall in its own right is the rapid loss of value. Key employees, customers and suppliers hesitate in the crisis and may leave the company before the transaction is completed. Anyone who does not stabilise these bonds early often takes over a hollowed-out shell. An initial assessment of the risks is provided by our M&A transaction risk profile.

Acquisition out of the opened proceeding

For a sale during opened proceedings, authority to contract must be determined according to the type of proceedings. Under section 117 IO, the selling of the business, all movable fixed and current assets or a part necessary for business operations, or real estate requires approval by the creditors committee and the insolvency court. Even where the debtor remains in possession, section 172 IO reserves the conclusion of these transactions to the restructuring administrator. Additionally, the administrator needs the consent of the debtor to realise assets. An offer or approval by management alone does not replace these requirements.

The acquisition of selected assets is permitted by an asset deal out of the estate. Each liability exception possesses its own scope: the business transfer rules of that provision are excluded by section 38(5) UGB for acquisitions through insolvency proceedings. Such acquisitions are exempted from liability under section 1409(1) and (2) ABGB by section 1409a ABGB. Purchaser liability under subsection (1) is excluded by section 14(2) BAO, in particular for acquisitions from an insolvency estate within section 2(2) IO. General immunity from liability is not conferred by these exceptions. Separate examination is required for contractually assumed obligations and other legal grounds. The importance of independent due diligence is increased by restricted seller warranties. How a review is structured is shown by the post on the due diligence checklist.

Regarding a transfer of business, section 3(2) AVRAG distinguishes the types of proceedings: in bankruptcy and restructuring proceedings without debtor-in-possession status, automatic succession to existing employment relationships under subsection (1) does not apply. Restructuring proceedings with debtor-in-possession status fall outside this exception; where a transfer of business occurs, succession under subsection (1) generally applies. Separate examination is required for key contracts, permits and third-party rights, such as retention of title or security rights. The sale agreement alone transfers neither all contracts nor every administrative permit. Required consents and the transferability of permits must be checked before completion. A deeper view on the transition of employees is offered by the post on the transfer of business under AVRAG.

Types of proceedings compared

Out-of-court crisis, proceedings without and with debtor-in-possession status

The state of the target company decides on the seller, the speed and the legal protection. The overview shows the most important differences.

Comparison of disposal powers, purchaser liability and employee transfers by type of proceedings
Aspect Out-of-court crisis Bankruptcy or restructuring without debtor-in-possession status Restructuring with debtor-in-possession status
Disposal powers Seller authorised to dispose of assets Insolvency administrator for the estate Debtor under section 171 IO; reserved powers under section 172 IO
Sale of business Seller; check corporate approvals Approvals under section 117 IO Concluded by restructuring administrator; debtor consent to asset realisation; approvals under section 117 IO
Acquisition structure Asset deal or share deal Typically an asset deal from the estate Asset deal from the estate under procedural rules
Legacy liabilities Check section 38 UGB, section 1409 ABGB and section 14 BAO Provision-specific exceptions; no general liability immunity Provision-specific exceptions; assess assumed obligations separately
Employment relationships Succession under section 3(1) AVRAG on a transfer of business Exception under section 3(2) AVRAG Generally succession under section 3(1) AVRAG on a transfer of business
Checks before completion Avoidance risks and liabilities Third-party rights, contract transfers and permits Additionally powers and consents where the debtor remains in possession

The precise requirements of a later avoidance and the applicable deadlines depend on the individual case and on the relevant version of the insolvency rules. They should be examined carefully before any transaction.

Caution in pre-insolvency acquisitions: An acquisition in the crisis that does not address the risks of a later avoidance or follow-on liability for legacy debts can be economically devalued by a later insolvency. Have the structure and the valuation reviewed before signing. Booking an initial consultation (180 euro) can quickly bring clarity.

Valuation, financing and restructuring contribution

Valuing a crisis-stricken company is particularly delicate. Classical multipliers often do not mirror the actual situation because results are distorted by special factors and the going-concern outlook is uncertain. Common approaches are scenario based, a separate liquidity plan from the buyer and a valuation of individual business parts rather than the whole company.

The financing of the acquisition is also more demanding. Banks tend to be reserved in crisis situations; often a mix of equity, vendor financing and, where appropriate, a contribution of the existing creditors to a restructuring package is needed. The structuring of these building blocks often shapes the achievable purchase price.

In practice it pays off to involve the lender perspective early in the structural decision. How the purchase price can be reflected in the contract is explained in the post on the purchase price adjustment via net debt and working capital. The concept of vendor financing is explored in the glossary entry on vendor loan.

Frequent questions

Distressed M&A in crisis and insolvency.

What is the difference between acquiring in the crisis and out of insolvency? +

Negotiations with the seller authorised to dispose of the assets, often involving the principal bank and important creditors, occur before proceedings open. Thereafter, powers and approvals depend on the type of proceedings. Where the debtor remains in possession, section 171 IO generally preserves its authority to act; however, the restructuring administrator concludes transactions under section 117 IO pursuant to section 172 IO. The debtor's consent is needed by the administrator to realise assets. Required approvals by the creditors committee and the court must be examined separately.

Which avoidance risks exist in an acquisition in the crisis? +

If an insolvency proceeding is opened after the acquisition within a certain period, legal acts of the debtor can under certain conditions be unwound. The decisive aspects are the insolvency avoidance situations, such as creditor disadvantage or the special knowledge of the parties. The precise requirements and deadlines should be carefully checked before any pre-insolvency acquisition.

Why is the acquisition out of the proceeding usually structured as an asset deal? +

The purchaser is permitted to select the assets to be acquired in an asset deal. Where an acquisition occurs through insolvency proceedings, the exception under section 38(5) UGB applies, and section 1409a ABGB excludes liability under section 1409(1) and (2) ABGB. For tax liability under section 14(1) BAO, the exception in section 14(2) BAO requires, in particular, acquisition from the insolvency estate. Neither contractually assumed obligations nor all other risks are eliminated by these rules. Examination is still required for third-party rights, transfers of contracts, and permits. A distinction between proceedings with and without debtor-in-possession status is also required for employee transfers.

Topics
Distressed M&ACrisisInsolvencyAsset dealAvoidance

Structuring a deal, reviewing a contract, securing the risks?

When buying a company, structure, review and contract decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg